<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Extension Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cutawaysecurity.com/blog/archives/225/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cutawaysecurity.com/blog/archives/225</link>
	<description>Cutaway's Observations, Opinions, Rants, Raves, Tantrums, and Tirades</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:30:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.cutawaysecurity.com/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-30887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cutawaysecurity.com/blog/archives/225#comment-30887</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm...Good point. 

At my Univ., networks extension are also not allowed. Why? Mainly due to the complexity of tracking down a host involved in copyright issues (DMCA) and inforcing NAC at a granular level (porting off a single student vs every student sitting behind a NAT device). 

Unless a VM with NAT is setup and users are allowed to RDEP/SSH into it as point of egress through the routable IP, I would say this is not a network extension in the spirit of our policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;Good point. </p>
<p>At my Univ., networks extension are also not allowed. Why? Mainly due to the complexity of tracking down a host involved in copyright issues (DMCA) and inforcing NAC at a granular level (porting off a single student vs every student sitting behind a NAT device). </p>
<p>Unless a VM with NAT is setup and users are allowed to RDEP/SSH into it as point of egress through the routable IP, I would say this is not a network extension in the spirit of our policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
